A decision that could change the course of Canada’s economic history
Chronology of events
Gérard Comeau, a resident of New Brunswick, was stopped by the RCMP upon his return from Quebec with several cases of beer, two bottles of whisky, and one bottle of spirits in his possession. He was fined $292.50 for violating the New Brunswick Liquor Control Act, which limits the number of bottles that one can import into the province. Gérard Comeau decided to contest his fine.
The Provincial Court of New Brunswick ruled that Section 134 (b) of the Liquor Control Act violates Section 121 of the British North America Act. The fine was therefore cancelled.
121. All articles of the growth, produce or manufacture of any of the provinces shall, from and after the Union, be admitted free into each of the other provinces.
After the province’s appeals court refused to hear the Comeau case, New Brunswick turned to the Supreme Court of Canada, which accepted in May to hear the case. Eleven provinces and territories are forming a united front in this case against Gerard Comeau. All have requested intervenor status, which they were automatically granted given that the case raises an argument of a constitutional nature.
December 6, 2017
Hearings began. The Supreme Court looked at the interpretation of Section 121 and the constitutionality of the New Brunswick law.
Date to remember: mid-2018
The Supreme Court’s decision in the Comeau case will be handed down around the middle of 2018.